"At least 360p" is not accurately defined in the guidelines. As evidence of this, it was required a snapshot poll to amend this. Unless challenger provides a clear definition of what 360p is, from any of the standardizing global organizations, like International Organization for Standardization, then there is no ground for a removal, since there is not a violation of the norm. Although not currently in the guidelines, in harmony with currently approved version of them, this profile should be accepted, since even considering that 352 is less than 360 pixels, there is no threat to Sybil Proofness, since the pixels cropped do not belong to face or body of the subject. In order to keep decentralization, a Civil Law approach to regulations is encouraged over Common Law, so jurisprudence is not relevant.