Rebuttal to 0x00de...5fc3 in Favor of "No"

Addressing your claim of bias, the whole reason for the video being uploaded was for transparency of how the data was collected. 

You're welcome to perform your own independent count, but you'll find that your picture is still not considered as a "face facing the camera"

I invite pending jurors to read the PDF submitted accompanying the video in evidence section #7, this will explain the collection of results, reasons for data exclusion, and explanations of the analysis methodology.

Everything has been posted and explained for transparency.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A65BVdJJPMk

To your accusation of editing the video to exclude responses:

Have you watched the video in its entirety? It is completely unedited as there are no jump cuts or trickery. Get a professional to confirm this if you are so in denial that you don't believe me.

Even so, if you think the researchers took multiple hour long videos and selected the best results, how likely is it that 33/33 responded coherently excluding your photo? We did not have that much time at all to prepare the evidence and went with the first video taken.

I find this accusation of dishonesty to be laughable and outright lazy.