Please review the more in-depth evidence submitted in case 829 regarding the batch of suspicious profiles this submission is a part of: https://ipfs.kleros.io/ipfs/QmbwhqKxF6pw53CeRKMKikWrAaCZdZb58EL7ZiWupMBbYM/consent.pdf

I have posted a similar request for further evidence from the submitter on case 830 on which I have been selected as juror and am now humbly asking the juries in all other cases related to this affair to apply the same reasoning.

I agree with the challenger that there is strong evidence that the address likely does not belong to the person in the video (and this is not allowed by the registry policy). As such I consider that the burden of proof has shifted to the submitter who should submit a new video of themselves before the end of the evidence period (still 4 days away). The submitter may for instance say "I am the owner of the address" in the video. To prove that the video has been taken recently, the submitter may display a recent Ethereum blockhash. He may display the following one for instance: 0x00c85c6e6b5e784119d093da466cbfdb62690d6992362733b02b58b26dfb9a25

I believe this request to be reasonable since, if the address truly belongs to the submitter, shooting and uploading this new video will require little effort and expense, while the challenger stands to lose 0.084 ETH.